×

Loading...

@Ottawa

Topic

This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
  • 枫下家园 / 医药保健 / 亚省改成只对症状严重的人检验后,感染人数略有下降。但打了疫苗的人数在新感染,活跃病例和住院人数更加碾压没打的人。这和以前的预计不同。本以为疫苗的人多是轻症,只会传给别人而已。现在看来,他们的症状更厉害。 +15


    :

    • 原来排队打疫苗,是排队注射病毒喔。。。 +12
      • 还争先恐后挤破头地注射病毒也是醉了 +3
    • 澳洲新威尔士州的数据显示死亡人数更是一边倒,最夸张的是昨天, 33 比3. +11
      We were told the experimental COVID vaccines were going to “stop the spread” and “prevent death and hospitalization.” The New South Wales government website released its daily Covid update. Based on its daily report, most of the people who died with COVID-19 in January 2022 were at least double vaccinated. Here is the data available…
      • 政府太没有职业道德了,赶紧做假数据啊 +11
      • 看了一下,大部分是70,80,90岁的人; 7天共死了208., 打了的157 占75.5%; 没打的51 占24.5%。 +2

        Jan 19 (vaccinated: 24, unvaccinated: 8)

        Jan 18 (vaccinated: 33, unvaccinated: 3)

        Jan 17 (vaccinated: 15, unvaccinated: 2)

        Jan 16 (vaccinated: 14, unvaccinated: 6)

        Jan 15 (vaccinated: 16, unvaccinated: 4)

        Jan 14 (vaccinated: 19, unvaccinated: 10)

        Jan 13 (vaccinated: 14, unvaccinated: 8)

        Jan 12 (vaccinated: 13, unvaccinated: 8)

        Jan 11 (vaccinated: 9, unvaccinated: 2)

    • 👍 +3
    • 防重症的神話破滅,這疫苗打了個寂寞🤣 +9
      • 快没打了,至少取消强制十八岁以上下打疫苗 +4
    • 仔細看一下亞省最新,120天的死亡,ICU,住院的分齡(Three doses,Two doses,Unvaccinated)數據 +4


      :

      :

      :

      • 白费劲,啦啦队偏爱油管等自媒体数据 +1
        • 咱是下定決心,不討論疫苗,單純看疫情 +1
      • 对照组实验组的样本大小一样进行比较才有意义。以你highlight的2组数据为例, +3
        60-69 70-79这2个年龄段实验组样本大小趋近全部人口了吧,分母大每10万人的比例肯定小了。同理对照组分母小每10万人的比例肯定高的吓人了。实际上年龄越小,对照组样本越大,分母越大比例相对低些。再说这是过去4个月累计数据 没有反映当前趋势
        还有这个数据是 ICU with covid, 还是 ICU due to covid? 不是不相信政府数据 很多数据并没有说明它是怎样统计出来的 吃瓜群众只能望文生义 各自解读了
      • 这个数据结果一目了然, 但是不信者恒不信 +1
    • 感染比例与打疫苗比例一样,说明不防感染。住院比例疫苗还有些许优势。按定义疫苗是用来防感染的,不是防重症的。 +7
      • is the booster the same? I suspect booster is completely useless against Omicron. +5
        • 据闻以色列打第四针了,依然不防O感染。只是增加了非特异性抗体,让重症少一些。
      • 你才知道啊 +2